Hildebrand McLeod & Nelson LLP - Hildebrand McLeod & Nelson LLP
Representing Plaintiffs Since 1926

Call To Speak With An Attorney

Important COVID19 Update: We know this is a stressful time for many, so we want to reassure you HMN is taking every measure to ensure the welfare of our staff and the continuity of our service to our clients. HMN continues to work to ensure that our valued staff, clients and families are following all recommendations provided by our local, state and national leadership. We are actively communicating with the courts to reschedule any proceedings and will continue to inform our clients of those developments. HMN remains available at any time via phone calls, emails and video chat. We are here for you no matter what unexpected life changes occur and that remains true today.

We also wish to express our utmost gratitude to the healthcare professionals working tirelessly to care for our community. Our thoughts are with all those impacted by the Coronavirus.

Image from an actual HMN case, reproduced with permission

Safety-monitoring drones become possible hazards

| Apr 8, 2018 | Blog |

Meant to catch safety violators in the act, railroad drones, like those used by Union Pacific, are branded as safety hazards by the people they’re meant to watch. Many railroad workers are aghast at the drone activity aimed at monitoring for unsafe actions. They’re complaining that the presence and movement of the drones distract from potentially dangerous work in and around the tracks.

Governmental Approval

Originally used only rarely to inspect tracks or check conditions after an accident, the use of drones increases each year. Union Pacific started using drones to monitor railroad employees in 2017. The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) approved Union Pacific’s use of drones back in 2015. Since then, Union Pacific increased their drone pilots to over a hundred and planned to double their number of them by the end of 2018.

Growing Controversy

This FAA-approved drone integration has its detractors. Union Pacific employees state that the drones cause a distraction that causes them to take their eyes off of the work at hand. Upon repeated complaints to the railroad, union officials and the FAA, Union Pacific halted their use of drones for employee surveillance while they speak with union representatives.

Employment Consequences

Railroad leadership is anxious to resume monitoring by drones because of its added ability to catch employees being unsafe on the job. One of the main results of drone monitoring is the citation of workers allegedly caught violating safety regulations at work.

While drones have many beneficial uses, care needs to be taken in their workplace integration. Possible safety issues caused by the presence of drones needs monitoring so that workers are not needlessly harmed on the job.